Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correction:
Roy Lewallen wrote: . . . Reflection coefficients are complex numbers, so they can't properly be described as "positive" or "negative" except in the special cases of +1 and -1. In all other cases, the can only be described by their magnitude and angle, or real and imaginary component. . . It's also reasonable to talk about positive or negative reflection coefficients when you're restricting the possibilities to ones having an angle of zero or 180 degrees. This would be the case, for example, when dealing with lossless lines (purely real Z0) connected to other lossless lines or to a purely resistive source or load. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |