Keith Dysart wrote:
But this same information has been repeatedly provided
and ignored. Will this time be different?

I'm not the one who is ignoring that information.
Where are your calculations involving destructive
and constructive interference? Until you provide
that information, you are just blowing smoke.

When are you going to realize that the effective
reflection coefficient for a source supplying zero
power is |1.0|?

You can certainly use the reflection coefficient
that you posted but that is only a small part of
the total reflection story.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com