On Jan 3, 12:04*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
On Jan 2, 2:48 pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
I assume that you have not provided a reference to support
this assertion because you have not been able to find one.
I provided the reference a number of times and you
chose to ignore it. The reference is the chapter on
interference in "Optics", by Hecht.

I am suprised that a book on optics would discuss the
output impedance of Thevenin equivalent circuits.

The "Optics", by Hecht reference is for destructive
and constructive interference, not Thevenin equivalent
circuits, but your attempt to confuse everyone is noted.

My attempt to confuse!? We were discussing the determination
of reflection coefficients for Thevenin equivalent circuits.

But in another post, you have agreed that there
is a complete lack of references supporting your
position, so the question is now settled and you
can use the standard methodology to compute
reflection coefficient at a generator where
the output impedance is well defined.

Enjoy the new ability to solve problems that
were previously outside your grasp.

...Keith

Keith Dysart wrote:
My attempt to confuse!? We were discussing the determination
of reflection coefficients for Thevenin equivalent circuits.

No, we were discussing destructive and constructive
interference. Sorry about your confusion.

But in another post, you have agreed that there
is a complete lack of references supporting your
position, ...

No, I said I am not going to look for them. Sorry
about your confusion.

Enjoy the new ability to solve problems that
were previously outside your grasp.

I'm sorry, Keith, delusions of grandeur are a problem
outside of my field of expertise. Perhaps a professional
shrink could help you better than I.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com