| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 19, 5:04*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
It is a gross confusion of cause and effect to say: "If two waves superpose to zero, those two waves don't exist." Then it should be a simple matter for you to actually measure the canceled waves and their energy in order to prove everyone wrong once and for all. If the component waves being emitted by a Yagi antenna don't exist, then it is a waste of time and money to put up a Yagi antenna. Maybe you should notify HP that they are wasting their time publishing the following equation since s11*a1 and s12*a2 don't exist. b1 = s11*a1 + s12*a2 = 0 That equation does *not* imply that s11*a1 and s12*a2 must equal zero. In fact those non-zero values are easy to calculate. Square each and you have the power associated with each of those components. And yet when b1=0, they refuse to deliver any. It doesn't seem to lend much support for your claim. The irradiance equation from optical physics can be derived by squaring the s-parameter normalized voltage equation. Since (a1*a2) is a phasor term in that equation, the phase angle between a1 and a2 must be included in the result. -- 73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com None of the well proven methods shows a need for there to be any energy in canceled, non-existant waves. HP would certainly never affiliate themselves with a claim that there's energy associated with waves that don't exist. The irradiance equation with all its "phasor terms" is no help either. Where there is no irradiance, there is no EM energy. Even Yagi antennas fail to radiate energy from their null points. The only person I've ever seen claiming that there is energy in non-existant waves is you, Cecil. On it's face, the idea is ludicrous. And apparently you don't even find beauty in the fact that, with no energy traveling in the direction of cancelled waves, there is no need to invent a "4th mechanism of reflection" in order to conserve that energy and get it moving in its correct direction of travel. As a bonus, there is no need for religious beliefs that interference and wave interaction cause waves to change direction. Accepting this would of course mean yet another delay in the quest for martyrdom. ac6xg |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
| What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna | |||