Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Gene Fuller wrote: I looked at that web page, and my reaction was merely, "so what"? There is nothing in there that is not well known to everyone who has ever used or studied interferometry. That's what I have been telling you guys for years. Everything we need to know about RF waves has already been discovered centuries ago by optical physicists. I used those centuries old laws of physics in my energy analysis article which produces voltage and current results identical to any conventional analysis. http://www.w5dxp.com/energy.htm You will come to understand that your concerns about "wave cancellation" and related stuff at interfaces are not only unimportant, ... This is so typical of gurus on this newsgroup. When they lose the argument, they invariably say it was not important to begin with. 1. Nice job of selective quoting to completely change the meaning of a message. Is that sort of like a line item veto? 2. As for the wave cancellation part, you have many times noted that stuff happens at interfaces or discontinuities. So why is it that you never ever consider what is happening inside those interfaces and discontinuities? Do you suppose the waves simply cancel, reflect, or whatever without assistance from the materials in the interface or discontinuity? Do you suppose that any energy or momentum considerations may need to include the materials? This is akin to the concept of Thevenin equivalents. The view from the outside is correct and useful. There is no information about what is actually happening on the inside of the Thevenin box. In the same way the wave reflection model as seen from outside the interface or discontinuity works just fine. There is virtually no disagreement about what one would observe if correct measurements were done. On the other hand there is no possibility of figuring out how the waves actually "cancel" or what happens to the energy and momentum without considering the actual physical configuration. That sort of analysis has been done, of course. It gets into all sorts of details on electrons and Fermi surfaces, but strangely enough, it does not require Java applets on web pages. Unless you want to look at the interactions of waves with materials in some detail, the concern about exactly what happens during a "reflection" is unimportant. The external equations work just fine. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |