Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
The truth is, the s-parameter analysis just says that the waves cancel. And you say the waves didn't cancel - that they don't even exist during steady-state. Take your pick about who is correct. If two waves cancel, as the s-parameter analysis says they do, it implies that they must first exist even if for only a dt of time. HP never considered anyone dense enough to require an assertion about the very existence of the s-parameter equation components. So in other words if you're wrong, then what you're saying violates conservation of energy. Exactly, and since the conservation of energy principle cannot be violated, I must be right. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Homebrew | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |