Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Harry,
Great explanations. Thank you. I will try to build your suggested antenna first chance I get. Will let you know how it works out. BTW: is this what's (also) called a "J Pole" ? Should it be pointed in any specific manner toward the source of what you are trying to receive ? e.g.: should a plane formed from the short & long lengths be pointed to the source ? Q1: I have no idea how it's constructed, but what I describe as vertical, the "tube" of the antenna is true up-down vertical. Q2: Signal is "fairly" strong; it's only the noise that makes it hard to listen to when held vertically in the normal manner. Much better horizontally, and vertically downward, like I mentioned. All my listening is indoors; perhaps as you mentioned this accounts for the S/N being better horizontally and vertically downward due to reflections, etc. ? Thanks again; appreciate your time and advice very much, Bob -------------------------------------- "Harry - SM0VPO" wrote in message ... When the unit is held normally, that is with the antenna vertical, the airport comms from the tower were really poor. Lots of static and noise. But, much better when held horizontally. a. Any idea why ? There are 10001 resons, but airfield communications ARE vertically polarised. They tend to use discone antennas for VHF and the "biconical monopole" for UHF. However, they are designed to broadcast to aircraft, which do not sit so close to the ground and so far away. There is likely to be an array of different antenna at the control tower and/or transmitter site, all of which could slightly affect that which you are receiving. The "rubber duck" antenna is NOT a 1/4-wave antenna at all. It is in fact a 3/4-wave antenna all coilled up, which gives a radiation pattern a little close to the fictitious "isotropic" antenna. People playing with rubber duck antennas on handheld gear rarely hold the things vertical, so the 3/4-wave gives a more uniform radiation in all directions - especially slightly up and down: more like a cylinder with a hole down the middle, than a donut. Another point is that the impedance of the 3/4-wave is more constant when your hands and head are close to the thing, but that is irrelevant for your application. Buildings tend to use metal structures, fittings, and wiring, all of which affect the passage of radio signals through them, especially at VHF. I have succesfully use existing mains conduit in the ceiling of a rented appartment as an antenna, by mutual coupling of feed and resonant "current breaks". Reflections from other buildings can also interract with the signal you receive. You may think that you predominantly receive the main direct path, but you would be surprised how often you are receiving reflections from other sources. Most GSM and all later generation of cellular phone base stations use polarisation diversity. That is one array of antennas 45-degrees to the left, and another array leaning to the right. All this is necessary because reflections and movements change polarisation. Q1: Are you sure that the antenna is vertically polarised? To be vertically polarised then the end bit should be higher than the bottom bit, and pointing at the sky. (Suoopid suggestion, I know, but you never know :-) Q2: Is the signal very strong? If weak then it could be arriving from any source. If you building is shielding your then you may be relying upon reflections from the bus park, aluminized billboard, power pylon, or the neighbours TV antenna, for reception. If you really want to receive these stations then use a simple antenna outside, in a controlled environment, without any unknown influences. Such an antenna need not be very complicated, in fact it could be built in a few minutes using a bit of wire and a broom handle. This link even does all the simple antenna calculations for you, for any frequency you want. http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/antennas/vpole0.htm If you want to receive a specific band with decent sensitivity (weak signas) then this link will give you some idea. http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/antennas/6dbvhf0.htm If you think that you have a weak signal, then see why at: http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/data/pathlos.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Bob,
On 14 ene, 19:44, "Robert11" wrote: Hi Harry, Great explanations. Thank you. I will try to build your suggested antenna first chance I get. Will let you know how it works out. BTW: is this what's (also) called a "J Pole" ? Should it be pointed in any specific manner toward the source of what you are trying to receive ? e.g.: should a plane formed from the short & long lengths be pointed to the source ? Q1: I have no idea how it's constructed, but what I describe as vertical, the "tube" of the antenna is true up-down vertical. Q2: Signal is "fairly" strong; it's only the noise that makes it hard to listen to when held vertically in the normal manner. Much better horizontally, and vertically downward, like I mentioned. Are you sure that it is noise, is there some speech or music in the "noise"? It could be an intermodulation product or just overload to your receiver from a local FM broadcast station. See what happens when you listen outside. when it is interference from your own domestic equipment, the level should drop when outside your house. Many so called "wide band receivers" give problems when used with a good outdoor antenna. Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl [rest deleted] |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Wimpie wrote: Hello Bob, On 14 ene, 19:44, "Robert11" wrote: Hi Harry, Great explanations. Thank you. I will try to build your suggested antenna first chance I get. Will let you know how it works out. BTW: is this what's (also) called a "J Pole" ? Should it be pointed in any specific manner toward the source of what you are trying to receive ? e.g.: should a plane formed from the short & long lengths be pointed to the source ? Q1: I have no idea how it's constructed, but what I describe as vertical, the "tube" of the antenna is true up-down vertical. Q2: Signal is "fairly" strong; it's only the noise that makes it hard to listen to when held vertically in the normal manner. Much better horizontally, and vertically downward, like I mentioned. Are you sure that it is noise, is there some speech or music in the "noise"? It could be an intermodulation product or just overload to your receiver from a local FM broadcast station. See what happens when you listen outside. when it is interference from your own domestic equipment, the level should drop when outside your house. Many so called "wide band receivers" give problems when used with a good outdoor antenna. Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl [rest deleted] it is not unusal for the transmiters at an airport to produce a huge amount of interrmod. This is because you may have a dozen or more transmitters all keying at once and their antennas are closely spaced often only 4 to 6 ft apart. This is not usally a problem for air traffic control because the receivers are remotely located from the transmitters often a mile or more separating the two. On the occasion this is a problem circulators are placed on the transmitters to eliminate the intermod' If you are a good distance from the tx site and are still experiencing an intermod probllem it is because the mixing action is taking place in your rx in instead of the transmitters. Jimmie Jimmie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna for receiving WWV/10MHz: am I asking too much? | Antenna | |||
Need some help designing a receiving antenna | Antenna | |||
Best Antenna for Receiving - NEWBIE | Antenna | |||
MFJ-1026 Dual Antenna Orientation | Shortwave | |||
Antenna orientation | Shortwave |