Universal laws of the sciences
 

Cecil Moore wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

Light does travel at a slower speed against the aether
but relativity changes the length of a second when going
against the aether so it is undetectable.


How does a second go against the aether?


Did I dangle a participle?

"Light does travel at a slower speed against the
aether but relativity changes the length of a second
when the light goes against the aether, so it is
undetectable."

I think what he means is, how does the second know which way the
aether is pointing and why does it care?

ac6xg

Universal laws of the sciences
 

Jim Kelley wrote:

...
I think what he means is, how does the second know which way the aether
is pointing and why does it care?

ac6xg


Just remember, as you are poking fun, Einstein, in a DIRECT statement,
ackowledged that the ether MUST exist for his theories to hold water ...
a truth some would rather ignore--for some reason(s.)

Regards,
JS

Universal laws of the sciences
 

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:36:02 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Did I dangle a participle?
how does the second know which way the
aether is pointing and why does it care?

Is this the wave vs. participle duality?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Universal laws of the sciences
 

Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:36:02 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Did I dangle a participle?
how does the second know which way the
aether is pointing and why does it care?

Is this the wave vs. participle duality?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Moan!!!
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Universal laws of the sciences
 

Jim Kelley wrote:
I think what he means is, how does the second know which way the aether
is pointing and why does it care?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformations
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com