| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
... More cecilaborations in rocket science to improve tug-of-war. The laugh riot continues. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC If you are truly laughing that loudly, you ARE an idiot. I think Cecil has done an excellent job, if you have followed him (and, I cannot claim I have COMPLETELY done so), however, he has shown there ARE holes in what we "believe." And, some things don't quite "mate-up" and what we have taken for granted looks differently when under the "microscope." "Standing Waves" is but the shining example. Your nature is just so abrasive/abusive as to be repulsive and, at least a bit, disgusting. I have to admit, I really don't understand you, or why you think simple discussion on these matters is so "dangerous." Frankly, though this all, I kind of like the "cloak-and-dagger" nature of your "cryptic" posts, however, lately them seem a bit move vicious and NOT that enjoyable. Don't we all come away better after having had to open a smith chart and plug some equations into a calculator? Look at some software modeling, etc.? I mean, I am at a total loss here ... you are the final oracle? Well, you and your chosen books? Get a hold on yourself man ... Regards, JS |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
| Standing Wave Phase | Antenna | |||
| Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
| Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
| What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna | |||