Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
From assertion A above, is it your contention that far from the antennas it is "interference" that causes the variation in field strength, but that on the line drawn between the two antennas some other mechanism is responsible? Of course not - please don't be ridiculous. If the two antenna elements were isotropic point sources, on a line drawn between them, there could be no interference and there would be only standing waves in free space along that line assuming no reflections from nearby objects, etc. Everywhere else there are components of waves traveling in the same direction so interference is possible anywhere except on that line between the point sources. When the sources are not a point, seems to me, interference could occur at any and all points in space. My "assertion A above" was about transmission lines, an essentially one-dimensional context. Two waves in a transmission line are either traveling in opposite directions or in the same direction. Incidentally, I came across another interesting quote from one of my college textbooks, "Electrical Communication", by Albert. "Such a plot of voltage is usually referred to as a *voltage standing wave* or as a *stationary wave*. Neither of these terms is particularly descriptive of the phenomenon. A *plot* of the effective values of voltage ... is *not a wave* in the usual sense. However, the term "standing wave" is in wide-spread use." [Emphasis is the author's] -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IC-M710 long distance communication, how long ? | Digital | |||
Non Radiative Energy | Antenna |