Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roy Lewallen wrote: Demo 4 of the TLVis1 program I posted reference to, shows that in a transmission line with a pure standing wave (load reflection coefficient magnitude of 1), the energy between nodes alternates between the electric field (line capacitance) and magnetic field (line inductance). This is true regardless of the line length or the source termination. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Yes, this is a very nice demo. Thank you for posting it. I have a question. In demo 4, the bottom window shows the Ee field in green, Eh in red, and ETot in black. When the demo starts, you can only see a green and a black trace. If you pause it just as the wave hits the end, you can now see the red trace, Eh. (This is an actual statement and has nothing to do with the fact I am Canadian.) What happened to the Eh trace as the wave is initally moving to the right? Is it overlaid by the Ee trace in green? Or is it just not plotted? Then, when the wave hits the end and starts reflecting, the red trace remains attached to ground, and the green trace moves up and connects with the black trace. (Sorry for the confusing description - you have to try it yourself to see.) Now, as you single step, the green trace and the red trace appear to be 180 degrees out of phase. My problem here is someone wrote a web page that claims the electric and magnetic fields are orthogonal: http://www.play-hookey.com/optics/tr...etic_wave.html I tried sending him an email to show if the fields were orthogonal as he claims, it would look like a pure reactance, and no energy would be transmitted. But he is stuck on his idea and won't budge. Now my problem is figuring out exactly what happens at the reflection, and why the Eh field behaves the way shown in your demo. Regards, Mike Monett |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IC-M710 long distance communication, how long ? | Digital | |||
Non Radiative Energy | Antenna |