Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
. . . The problem with the use of the Thevenin or Norton equivalents is that you have to exactly respect the limitations in order to use them properly... that is the part of the circuit being replaced with the 'black box' equivelent must be linear and time invariant, and the analysis is only valid for sinusoidal steady state. This last one is what gets everyone, it eliminates all the transients and makes it impossible to use to figure out what happens when that first reflection physically happens... you have to ignore all that stuff and only consider the steady state solution. . . . That's not true. A Thevenin or Norton equivalent generator can produce a voltage or current, respectively, which is any function of time. This of course includes single pulses and pulsed sinusoids, as well as an infinite number of others. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current | Antenna | |||
Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current WAS rraa Laugh Riot continues | Antenna | |||
Standing wave on feeders | Antenna | |||
Dipole with standing wave - what happens to reflected wave? | Antenna | |||
What is a traveling-wave antenna? | Antenna |