Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
I believe that I'm asking a question that your theories of power waves
are fundamentally incapable of answering... but that's a problem for you
and your theories, not for me.

Quoting from the article on my web page:

"Note that this is NOT a new and different method of system analysis.
The only purpose of this paper is to illustrate how to track the
energy at an impedance discontinuity point in a transmission line."

It does so by recognizing destructive interference between two phasor
voltages when the relative phase angle is greater than 90 degrees and
the constructive interference between two phasor voltages when the
relative phase angle is less than 90 degrees.

There are lots of questions that cannot be answered by any discussion
of power only. My *ONLY* purpose is to track the energy components
which is in addition to standard system analysis. There is absolutely
no conflict between the two subjects. The energy components are always
associated with voltages and currents.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:31:38 -0500, W5DXP
wrote:
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
I believe that I'm asking a question that your theories of power waves
are fundamentally incapable of answering... but that's a problem for you
and your theories, not for me.

Quoting from the article on my web page:

:-)