View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old July 27th 03, 04:14 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:49:22 +0100, "Ian White, G3SEK"
wrote:
As you yourself say, the Bird senses current and voltage samples; and
these are then added (forward) or subtracted (reverse). There is no
physical mechanism inside the Bird by which E x I multiplication takes
place, so power is not directly sensed or measured.

In the Bird, scaling
is an electrical adjustment.


No, the meter scale comes from an external calibration.


Hi Ian,

If you boil down power to heat, it still takes the scale on a
thermometer to confirm the magnitude. Scales are a form of
quantifying into scientific rigor the qualitative utterances of "not
much power," "some power," "more power," "a lot of power...." Denying
that multiplication is performed through the observance of established
boundary conditions and the movement of a coil in a magnetic field
(the resulting torsion which easily conforms to evidence of power) by
nay-saying is not compelling argument.

I've seen antennas described as "transducers" and with this current
side-topic, the Bird Wattmeter is more so such a transducer in its
translation of electrical power to physical power. The Bird Wattmeter
consumes power at a known ratio to the applied power. Ratios are one
of the simplest and most resolved quantities to confirm. There is
very little, short of serious physical abuse, that can disturb this
ratio (such as overpowering the line to create breakdowns such that
there are destructive arcs or fusing current). Efficiency aside (that
power lost to resistors within the sensing circuit), power of a known
ratio magnitude is invested in the needle's angular deflection and
holding it against spring tension. Newton would easily accept this as
"Power." It is basically what he called the ballistic pendulum.

If one cannot measure Power with a Bird Wattmeter, then prayer is the
only solution to the enigma of its reckoning. If you have issue with
the systemic failures that abound in Power determination, then argue
the cause not the instrument. I have described in the past how Power
determination can be upset drastically in the face of measurements
performed between two mismatches (both the source and the load); but
it is not the fault of the instrument in the Power determination's
failure. No other instrument nor method (short of acknowledging the
indeterminacy of phase) will improve over sure failure.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC