Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 07:49:22 +0100, "Ian White, G3SEK"
wrote: As you yourself say, the Bird senses current and voltage samples; and these are then added (forward) or subtracted (reverse). There is no physical mechanism inside the Bird by which E x I multiplication takes place, so power is not directly sensed or measured. In the Bird, scaling is an electrical adjustment. No, the meter scale comes from an external calibration. Hi Ian, If you boil down power to heat, it still takes the scale on a thermometer to confirm the magnitude. Scales are a form of quantifying into scientific rigor the qualitative utterances of "not much power," "some power," "more power," "a lot of power...." Denying that multiplication is performed through the observance of established boundary conditions and the movement of a coil in a magnetic field (the resulting torsion which easily conforms to evidence of power) by nay-saying is not compelling argument. I've seen antennas described as "transducers" and with this current side-topic, the Bird Wattmeter is more so such a transducer in its translation of electrical power to physical power. The Bird Wattmeter consumes power at a known ratio to the applied power. Ratios are one of the simplest and most resolved quantities to confirm. There is very little, short of serious physical abuse, that can disturb this ratio (such as overpowering the line to create breakdowns such that there are destructive arcs or fusing current). Efficiency aside (that power lost to resistors within the sensing circuit), power of a known ratio magnitude is invested in the needle's angular deflection and holding it against spring tension. Newton would easily accept this as "Power." It is basically what he called the ballistic pendulum. If one cannot measure Power with a Bird Wattmeter, then prayer is the only solution to the enigma of its reckoning. If you have issue with the systemic failures that abound in Power determination, then argue the cause not the instrument. I have described in the past how Power determination can be upset drastically in the face of measurements performed between two mismatches (both the source and the load); but it is not the fault of the instrument in the Power determination's failure. No other instrument nor method (short of acknowledging the indeterminacy of phase) will improve over sure failure. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |