Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 3:06 pm, Dave99 wrote:
OK thanks... Actually I was reading something that indicated you should add in a velocity factor for the tube when using it as a sleeve. I had never heard of that either, so I wasn't sure. They used . 95 I believe. So I guess you would go coax center conductor to tube section #1, braid to center of second coax through section #1 to section #2. Coax from section #1 through section #2 to section #3 and so on? DD If you are wanting to make a coaxial collinear using solid metal tube (copper? aluminum?) for the elements, why not just make that tube the outer conductor of coaxial sections. The inner conductor can be a piece of solid copper wire, that then connects to the outer conductors of the adjacent sections. Or maybe that's what you mean; it's not really very clear to me. Be aware that the phasing of the coaxial collinear is controlled by the electrical length of the coaxial sections. For a "flat pancake" pattern they should be an electrical half wave. Depending on the insulation, that may be considerably shorter than a freespace half wave. That does not directly matter to the antenna; non-resonant antennas work just fine. The feedpoint impedance will be the parallel combination of all the feedpoints (assuming low loss electrical half- wave connecting sections), transformed by any coaxial stub between the last feedpoint and the feedline. The "feedpoints" are all the gaps between sections. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Velocity factor | Antenna | |||
velocity factor??? | Antenna | |||
Velocity Factor (VP) for RG8X? | Antenna | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Equipment | |||
Measuring Velocity Factor w/ MFJ-259 | Homebrew |