Derek wrote:
On Mar 7, 3:45 am, Roy Lewallen wrote:

snippage

Even that might not be adequate, depending on the design of the
transmitter. Any power or other wires connected to the transmitter could
easily become part of the radiator, so they'd have to be decoupled. A
small, battery-powered transmitter with no connected wires would avoid
this potential problem.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


You still don't understand! you are talking bull**** you have no
idea of the design of Art's antenna or of how it works or it's needs
yet you put up your remedies for old style antenna's.

And yet, all we are given is "This is my design, it works, accept it!"

This whole thing smacks of alternative science, where everyone is
required to suspend disbelief, maximize credulousity (is that a word?
;^) ). Everyone has to accept it as true, and if you don't you are
subject to attacks. Somehow it becomes the job of the establishment to
prove it correct, and if they don't, it is discounted as conspiracy,
professional jealousy, incompetence, or in some of the more amazing
examples, not enough people believing in it..


Copper bracelets, magnetic water and bedsheets, super duper gas mileage
enhancers that Detroit doesn't want you to have, pyramids, crystals,
thought amplifiers, cold fusion, and on and on and on.


http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...ics/signs.html


It's all there. Perhaps this is real, perhaps a new day is dawning in
antenna design. I would never dream of pronouncing the antenna a
non-starter with the paucity of information given. But a whole lot of
what is in that guide is here too.

Not the least impressive is that this revolution is starting in
rraa..... ;^)


Another possibility... since this whole 'tenna thing is working outside
of the mainstream, maybe they'll take it on over at "Mythbusters". You'd
have top admit that Kari would be a lot more pleasant to verify these
claims with than most of us here......


- 73 de Mike N3LI -