Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote:
"AI4QJ" wrote in : 2. EZNEC is not a propagation modeler as its users are well aware; If it cannot predict take-off angle then what good is it? It doesn't matter if we warm the clouds directly above? You may have issues with Roy, but it is pretty unprofessional to deride his program on that account. It does predict the angle of maximum radiated power. "Take off angle" is a great term for those who believe that the energy exits the antenna as a blob, all in one place, and no energy elsewhere. It isn't a propagation tool, it's a design tool, and as such propagation is not at issue. Apples/Oranges. But you're a smart fellow, so I guess you are pulling our collective legs here.. 8^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - Watch it, Mike, he may plonk you, a fate worse than running out of beer. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
20 M vertical ground plane antenna performance? | Antenna | |||
Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |