Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 9:53*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Hey Keith, how about this one? * * * * * * * *Rs * * * * * * Pfor=50w-- * * * * *+----/\/\/-----+----------------------+ * * * * *| * *50 ohm * * * * * *--Pref * * * *| * * * * *| * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | * * * * Vs * * * * * * * * * 45 degrees * * RLoad+j0 * * * 100v RMS * * * * * * * 50 ohm line * * * | * * * * *| * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | * * * * *| * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | * * * * *+--------------+----------------------+ The dissipation in the source resistor is: P(Rs) = 50w + Pref How can anyone possibly argue that reflected power is *never* dissipated in the source resistor? :-) It is time for a more complete analysis. For the sake of an example let us set Rload to 150 ohms. That makes a nice voltage RC at the load of 0.5. Vs = 100 V rms At the generator end Vf.g = 50 V rms Pf.g = 50 W avg Vr.g = 25 V rms Pr.g = 12.5 W avg At the source resistor, before the reflection returns, the dissipation in the source resistor is Prs.br = 50 W avg and after the reflection returns it is Prs.ar = 62.5 W avg Yup, it sure looks like that reflected wave is dissipated in the source resistor since 62.5 = 50 + 12.5, does it not? But let us examine in more detail... Vs = 100 V rms Vs(t) = 141 cos(wt) Vf.g = 50 V rms Vf.g(t) = 70.7 cos(wt) Pf.g = 50 W avg Pf.g(t) = 50 cos(2wt) + 50 Vr.g = 25 V rms Vr.t(t) = 35.35 cos(wt-90degrees) Pr.g = 12.5 W avg Pr.g(t) = 12.5 cos(2wt) + 12.5 The power in the source resistor, before the reflection returns is Prs.br = 50 W avg Prs.br(t) = 50 cos(2wt) + 50 and after the reflection returns Prs.ar = 62.5 W avg Prs.ar(t) = 62.5 cos(2wt-53.13degrees) + 62.5 So, while the average powers seem to sum nicely to support the claim, when the actual power as a function of time is examined it can be seen that the power in the source resistor is NOT the sum of its dissipation pre-reflection plus the power from the reflection. This solidly disproves the claim that the reflected power is dissipated in the source resistor. You may find the spreadsheet at http://keith.dysart.googlepages.com/...oad,reflection useful in taking some of the tedium out of the calculations. And yes, if your anti-virus tools do not like Excel macros, you may have to invoke your authority over your tools. (They do know who is boss, do they not?) ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Food for thought: Forward and reverse power" comments | Antenna | |||
Yaesu Ft920 power hooked up in reverse/reverse polarity | Equipment | |||
Yaesu Ft920 power hooked up in reverse/reverse polarity | Equipment |