Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe other folks have mentioned that when the radials are buried,
no specific length is required for the antenna to be resonant. The more radials you use and the longer they are, the lower the loss. There's a point of diminishing returns for both length and number, and it turns out that if you have only a few radials, making them very long doesn't help much. Elevated radials normally have to be close to a quarter wavelength long for resonance unless they're very close to the ground in which case they need to be somewhat shorter. You can use the same techniques to shorten elevated radials, though, as you do a vertical radiating element. You can add a loading inductance at the feedpoint or farther along each radial, you can use a capacitive "hat" at the end, or some combination of the two. And just as happens with loaded verticals, the result will be narrower bandwidth, lower feedpoint resistance at resonance, and potentially higher loss. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radials -- the same length or not??? | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials again | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Antenna | |||
Length & number of radials | Equipment | |||
Length & number of radials | Homebrew |