Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote:
Sonny Hood wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:05:54 -0800, Roy Lewallen wrote: The gain and pattern will be very close to that of a dipole at a height of about 24 feet. Maximum field strength will be straight up, and quite dependent on the ground characteristics. What's a point incident antenna? Hi Roy, I consider it the radiation point of a "0" length element which radiates in spherical direction. Careful there. A "zero length" (or infinitesimal) dipole (aka a Hertzian dipole) does not have an isotropic (spherical) pattern. It has 1.64dBi directivity, as I recall. His definition fits the description of an isotropic antenna. It's not a dipole or any other kind of real antenna, and has a directivity of one by definition. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2.4ghz inverted V? | Antenna | |||
Trapping my 80m Inverted L for 160? | Antenna | |||
inverted V in a tree? | CB | |||
Inverted "V" with angle=60° | Antenna | |||
KAM Plus: CW Xmit is Inverted.. Help?? | Digital |