| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Antenna tuners 'like' antennas that are 'too long' better than antennas that are 'too short'. That doesn't say anything about how well that 'too long'/'too short' antenna will perform, just that the average tuner will find it easier to deal with one that's 'too long'. (Easier to 'cram' more capacitance into a tuner than inductance.) If this antenna is a doublet, 'balanced', why would you need a 'groundplane'? And while I'd guess that it'll never be 'ideal', the building is acting as a 'groundplane' anyway, sort of. - 'Doc (What am I not understanding about the situation?) I don't think you are missing anything; your comments sound reasonable to me. The building is the nearly new local firehouse HQ. The Chief and staff have outlined very strict parameters for our antenna location and setup. They fabricated the aluminum mast and will install it on the side of the building per their own design. Even at that, they gritted their teeth at the visual impact it has. No stand-off supported open ladder line for us! We must work with this and I don't see any feed alternative than coax. The only thing we 'may' have some flexibility with is the length of the antenna. ( Sorry Cecil, I guess I should have mentioned that up front ). We are limited to the length of the side of the building, which I estimated would give us up to 40 feet of element from the top of the mast. However, in hindsignt, I believe we could at that end point drop some additional length down off the end for a longer antenna.... would probably give us better operation on 75 & 80. Ed |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question on dipole SWR problem | Antenna | |||
| dipole question | Antenna | |||
| Low dipole performance question | Antenna | |||
| Dipole question | CB | |||
| Dipole Length Question | Antenna | |||