Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . 196,
"Ed_G" wrote: "Left Floating" so that there is less Capacitance to RF Ground, and more distance between the vertical parallel Feedlines. It would even help if you can use twin Coax Runs, to put them on opposite sides of the Aluminum Mast, which would give you more separation with the same Coupling Capacitance to the Mast. Capacitive coupling to RF Ground, is the Killer here, and you MUST reduce that, as much as possible, if your system is going to have any chance at reasonable operation. Please read my response and question just posted to Owen. With both shields tied together, but not grounded, nor connected to the antenna either, I do not understand how common mode current is an issue on the shields. We could use the mast as a physical separation as you suggested, ( the mast is not grounded, either, but again, what is the point, if the two coax shields were "as one" anyway? Ed I Most of the discussion here is more esoteric, than practical. You have an imposed Antenna Requirement, that gives you little wiggle room in what you can do. I have given you the ideas, that are proven in the Real World, for installations with similar requirements. As I stated in my first post, these type systems, ALL preform equally BAD, when compared to the Antenna Systems, that these type tuners were DESIGNED to feed. They are intended to feed a Marconi Vertical, with a very Low Impedance RF Ground. That is where they work BEST. Everything else will be a poorer situation. How poor, will depend on a BIG pile of variables, most of which are esoteric in significance, and will not make a significant difference in actual Practical Performance of the Station. Again as I stated in my last post, Capitative Coupling to RF Ground is the BIG Killer, the second largest problem is selecting antenna length, so as the Natural Impedance of the antenna is NOT anywhere near a frequency that you need to operate on. All the rest, is Picking Nits, and can be discussed at infinitum, without changing the actual performance in any significant way. One of the posters suggested building an "counterpoise", (God, I hate that Term) RF Ground from Aluminum Alarm Tape, on the roof, and then feeding what would be essentially a end feed wire antenna. That would be preferable, IF you could get the Biggies to go along, but that was NOT, part of the original Problem. In the real WORLD, your Comm's are going to depend more on, if the Band is Open, for your Distance, and Frequency, to the destination, than the Antenna design, and if the Band is NOT open, you aren't going to talk, as Ground Wave Comm's are not usually a significant part of HF Communications. Just a note, for historical purposes. There was a highly modified SEA1612B Tuner that was designed to feed a Balanced Antenna. It was fabricated out of Two, (2) Tuner Boards, using a Common CPU/Sensor System, that determined the configuration of the Switched Elements on one side of the Antenna, and then locked the same configuration on the Second board for the other side. This scheme was developed by Don Hollingsworth Sr. at G&L Marine Radio, in Seattle, Washington, and was deployed in one or two installations of Maritime Mobile Limited Coast Stations. I never did hear just how well they worked. -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question on dipole SWR problem | Antenna | |||
dipole question | Antenna | |||
Low dipole performance question | Antenna | |||
Dipole question | CB | |||
Dipole Length Question | Antenna |