Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 10:25*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: When the instantaneous energy flows are examined it can be seen that Prs is not equal to 50 W plus Pref. That is irrelevant. The power (irradiance) model doesn't apply to instantaneous energy and power. Hecht says as much in "Optics". Nobody has ever claimed that the energy/power analysis applies to instantaneous values. Are you saying that conservation of energy does NOT apply to instantaneous values? The energy/power values are all based on RMS voltages and currents. There is no such thing as an instantaneous RMS value. I understand the analysis technique you are proposing. That it leads to the wrong conclusion can be easily seen when the instantaneous energy flows are studied. This merely demonstrates that the analysis technique has its limitations. The bottom line remains that the reflected energy is not dissipated in the source resistor, even for the special cases under discussion. ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |