Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Hecht seems to have sufficient reputation that I trust that he made this statement in the context of optics and not in the context of electrical circuits. EM waves are EM waves, Keith, no matter what the frequency. EM waves all obey the laws of reflection physics, superposition, and conservation of energy principle. If you want to prove those laws to be invalid and replace them with ones of your own design, be our guest. Cecil, It is likely that all of these interference-related items you like to quote from Hecht are cast in an environment of lossless optical components. The characteristic impedance is set by the index of refraction of the various layers, but none of the optical layers have any absorption. Soooo, how does any of this optical stuff extend to making arguments about the absorption or re-reflection of energy in the source resistor for the HF case? The laws of physics may be inviolate, but it is not quite so clear that your derived and extended models share the same characteristic. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |