| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 7, 8:30*am, Roger Sparks wrote:
Hi Keith, I must still not be "getting" something because while I now follow your numbers and trig identity, it looks to me like you used Cecil's premise "PRs = 50w + Pref * " to show that '50 W plus Pref' = 68 + 68cos(2wt-61.9degrees) watts, which would be correct for the 12.5 ohm case. So, rather than disproving Cecil's premise, you successfully demonstrated that it was correct in the instantaneous case. What am I missing? The actual dissipation in the source resistor was computed using circuit theory to derive the voltage and current through the resistor and then multiplying them together to get the power dissipation: Vrs(t) = 82.46 cos(wt -30.96 degrees) Irs(t) = 1.649 cos(wt -30.96 degrees) Prs.circuit(t) = Vrs(t) * Irs(t) = 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees) This was then shown not to be equal to the results using Cecil's hypothesis because Prs.before(t) = 50 + 50 cos(2wt) Pref(t) = 18 - 18 cos(2wt) which would give, using Cecil's hypothesis Prs.cecil(t) = 68 + 32 cos(2wt) So I accept the circuit theory result of Prs.circuit(t) = 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees) and conclude that, since the results using Cecil's hypothesis are different, Cecil's hypothesis must be incorrect. That is, the power dissipated in the source resistor after the reflection returns is not the sum of the power dissipated in the resistor before the reflection returns plus the power in the reflected wave. Now it does turn out that the average power dissipated in the source resistor is the sum of the average power before the reflection returns plus the average power in the reflected wave since Prs.circuit.average = average( 68 + 68 cos(2wt -61.92 degrees) ) = 68 This does agree with Cecil's analysis using average powers. But energy flows must balance on a moment by moment basis if energy is to be conserved so when we do the instantaneous analysis we find that Cecil's hypothesis does not hold. ...Keith PS: To compute Vrs(t) and Irs(t) using circuit theory: The generator output voltage Vg(t) = Vf.g(t) + Vr.g(t) where Vf.g(t) is the line forward voltage at the generator and Vr.g(t) is the line reflected voltage at the generator. The generator output current Ig(t) = If.g(t) + Ir.g(t) where If.g(t) is the line forward current at the generator and Ir.g(t) is the line reflected current at the generator. Where Vs(t) is the source voltage Vrs(t) = Vs(t) - Vg(t) Irs(t) = Ig(t) and the power is Prs.circuit(t) = Vrs(t) * Irs(t) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting | |||