Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Quoting "Optics", by Hecht, Chapter 12. "Thus far in our discussion of phenomena involving the superposition of waves, we've restricted the treatment to that of either completely coherent or completely incoherent disturbances. ... There is a middle ground between these antithetic poles, which is of considerable contemporary concern - the domain of *partial coherence*. "Contemporary" is an interesting word choice. Partial coherence has been recognized for a long time. There is a very widely referenced paper by H. H. Hopkins on partial coherence in optical imaging systems that was published in 1950. He did not invent the concept, but he did popularize the standard formulation still used today. The math is a bit messy, with 4 dimensional integrals and other complications, but numerical solutions are widely done. I would be quite surprised if the radar and other RF experts don't use the same type of analysis. Oh, by the way, even a completely monochromatic wave can be partially coherent if the source is extended. Indeed, that is one of the more common configurations. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |