| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Keith Dysart wrote:
. . . The equation Pg(t) = Pf.g(t) + Pr.g(t) is more interesting. The basis for this is superposition. The forward and reverse voltage and current are superposed to derive the actual voltage and current. It would seem invalid to also sum the powers. To me it was a complete surprise that summing the voltages produces the correct total voltages and, at the same time, summing the powers (which are a squared function of the voltage) also produce the correct result. But by starting with the equations used to derive forward and reverse voltage and current, it can be easily shown with appropriate substitution that Ptot is always equal to Pforward + Preverse (Or Pf - Pr if you use the other convention for the direction of the energy flow)s. It simply falls out from the way that Vf and Vr are derived from Vactual and Iactual. It only holds true when Z0 is purely real. Of course, when it isn't, time domain analysis becomes very much more cumbersome. But it's not hard to show the problem using steady state sinusoidal analysis, and that's where the cos term appears and is appropriate. So Pg(t) = Pf.g(t) + Pr.g(t) is always true. For any arbitrary waveforms. Inclusion of cos(theta) terms would be incorrect. ...Keith Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting | |||