| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 22, 9:36*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Roger Sparks wrote: Ooooppps. That should have been Vg(t) = Vf.g(t) + Vr.g(t) but doesn't this describe the standing wave? * Not by itself. It is simply the function describing the voltage at point g. The net total voltage at point g is the standing wave voltage that is present at that point. I suppose that is a name you could use, but do you still call it "standing wave voltage" when there is no reflected wave, i.e. Vr is 0 for all time. There is no standing wave when Vr is always 0. ...Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting | |||