| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 22, 10:14*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Ps(t) = 100 + 116.6190379cos(2wt-30.96375653) Prs(t) = 68 + 68cos(2wt-61.92751306) Pg(t) = 32 + 68cos(2wt) Pf.g(t) = 50 + 50cos(2wt) Pr.g(t) = -18 + 18cos(2wt) Now it is time for you to explain exactly why you believe in a conservation of power principle. Do you demand that the instantaneous power delivered by a battery charger be instantaneously dissipated in the battery being charged? Are you making this a trick question by using the word "dissipated"? If not, then yes. Consider my laptop which has an external power supply connected by a cord to the laptop. Conservation of energy means that the instantaneous energy flow (i.e. power) along this cord into the laptop is always exactly equal to the sum of - the sum of energy being dissipated as heat in each individual component - the increase in energy being stored in components such as capacitors, inductors and batteries, minus any stored energy being returned from components such as capacitors, inductors and batteries - energy being emitted such as - light (e.g. display) - sound (e.g. fans, speakers) - RF (e.g. Wifi antennas, RFI) - etc. So yes, the phrase "conservation of power" is appropriately descriptive and follows from conservation of energy. If not, why do you require such for the example under discussion? I require it for both. The correct equation for adding the powers above is? Prs(t) = Pf.g(t) + Pr.g(t) +/- 2*SQRT[Pf.g(t)*Pr.g(t)] The last term is the interference term. The sign of the interference term is negative if Vf.g(t) and Vr.g(t) are out of phase. The sign of the interference term is positive if Vf.g(t) and Vr.g(t) are in phase. Vf.g(t) and Vr.g(t) are in phase for half of the cycle. Vf.g(t) and Vr.g(t) are out of phase for the other half of the cycle. The "excess" energy from the destructive interference is dissipated in the source resistor as constructive interference after being delayed by 90 degrees. Where is "cos(theta)" in this? And what "theta" is to be used? Is it the same theta that was used to conclude that this was a "no interference" example? See "A Simple Voltage Source - No Interference" at http://www.w5dxp.com/intfr.htm So the plus/minus in the equation aboves means that for part of the cycle we should add and part of the cycle we should subtract. This equation is ambiguous and is therefore incomplete since it does not tell us when we should add and when we should subtract. Could you provide a mathematically precise description of when we should do each? Where is this destructive interference energy stored while waiting to be dissipated constructively later? If it is in a capacitance, which one? Does the voltage on the capacitance increase appropriately to account for the energy being stored? Similarly if it is stored in an inductance. ...Keith |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
| Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
| WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting | |||