On Mar 31, 9:01*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
Perhaps, but it is highly improbable that it falls apart
in a manner that ends up supporting the original failed
hypothesis.

Since the original hypothesis is in the context of
zero interference (and average powers) it has not
failed. So far, I have made no assertions about
conditions when interference is present as it is
in all of your examples. None of your observations
are relevant to my Part 1 article because they are
all outside the stated context of the article.

The challenge for you is to present a zero interference
example for which my hypothesis is false. So far, you
have failed to do so.

We are talking about the same circuit, which you now
claim exhibits interference, rendering your hypothesis
moot.

I have asserted, "If zero interference exists, then 'A'
is true". You have said 'A' is not true when interference
exists. I actually agree with you but it is irrelevant
to the stated 'if' portion of my premise. Where did
you study logic?

Good that you agree. And now that you state that the
circuit exhibits interference, it might be best to
withdraw your example.

...Keith