Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith Dysart wrote:
After many posts and back and forth, I understand. But the poor first reader will miss the implications: that the imputed energy in the reflected wave is not dissipated in the source resistor. You have yet to provide an example of zero interference where the reflected power is not dissipated in the source resistor. Until you do that, you are just waving your hands. Examples containing interference will be covered in Parts 2 & 3 but the poor first reader will not get to read them until you cease your present unethical behavior. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |