Keith Dysart wrote:
And recall that expressing Cecil's claim
using instantaneous
powers requires that the imputed reflected power be accounted for in
the source
resistor, and not the source.

Keith, I hope that Roger knows you are uttering falsehoods
about what I have said.

I. My Part 1 claim applies *ONLY* to a zero interference
precondition. Your example contains interference. Therefore,
my claim does NOT apply to your example. Examples containing
interference are yet to be covered in Parts 2 and 3 of
my series of articles. I am going to state my claims once
again.

1. If zero interference exists at the source resistor, all of
the reflected energy is dissipated in the source resistor.
Your example does NOT contain zero interference.

2. If interference exists at the source resistor, the energy
associated with the interference flows to/from the source
and/or to/from the load. This claim covers the present
example under discussion.

II. I have said many times that the source can adjust
its output to compensate for the destructive interference
and constructive interference in the system. It is ONLY
under zero interference conditions that all of the
reflected energy is dissipated in the source resistor.
You have failed to offer an example where that assertion
is not true GIVEN THE ZERO INTERFERENCE PRECONDITION.

The example under discussion is not covered by any of
my Part 1 claims.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com