Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 8:01*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Finer grained analysis shows that the imputed energy (not average) in the reflected wave is not dissipated in the source resistor. It is the joules in instantaneous power that must be conserved, not the instantaneous power. There is no such thing as a conservation of power principle yet all you have presented are power calculations. "Where's the beef?" The computation using energy instead of power has also been done (and published here) and found also to demonstrate that the reflected is not dissipated in the source resistor. How many joules are there in 100 watts of instantaneous power? Obviously. It depends on how long you let the 100 W of instantaneous power flow. Integrate and the answer shall be yours. ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |