LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old April 14th 08, 07:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default The Rest of the Story

Keith Dysart wrote:
Ahhh, but there is then agreement that energy flows (power) must
be in balance to satisfy conservation of energy.


You can probably answer your own question by figuring
out how the light energy in an interference pattern
gets from the dark ring to the bright ring some
distance away. Do you think it happens faster than
the speed of light?

It is just that it comes up short since there is no
explanation of where the energy goes. Were an adequate
explanation to be offered, I would quite accept it.


I am satisfied with the destructive/constructive
interference explanation. That you have come up
short in tracking those component energies is not
unexpected given your prejudices.

If you told me your car disappeared from existence
because you cannot find it, I wouldn't believe you
either.

You should tread back through the posts, the question was
answered.


"It depends" was no answer - that was just mealy-mouthing.

In the special case presented in Part 1, there are only
two sources of power dissipation in the entire system,
the load resistor and the source resistor.


Three! The source can also take energy from the system.


The Vs source has zero resistance rendering dissipation
impossible. I repeat: There are only two sources of
power *DISSIPATION* in the entire system, the load
resistor and the source resistor.

The source can certainly throttle back its output when
there is destructive interference in the source resistor
and increase its output when there is constructive
interference in the source resistor, but it CANNOT
dissipate any power.

Since you have overlooked the source, the rest of your
post is quite flawed in its conclusions.


Nope, you are confused. The source can adjust its output
but the source cannot *DISSIPATE* power. As I said, the
only sources of power *DISSIPATION* are the two resistors.
No amount of obfuscation is going to change that.

Perhaps adding a circulator to my Part 1, Fig. 1-1 will
allow you to see things in a clearer light. Of course,
using light would be even better.

Gnd--1---2---Vs---Rs-----45 deg 50 ohm----------RL
\ /
3
|
50 ohms
|
GND

How much power is dissipated in the circulator
resistor?

How much power does the source have to supply to
maintain 50 watts of forward power on the transmission
line?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Now for the rest of the story! [email protected] General 2 April 28th 06 05:39 PM
Now for the rest of the story! [email protected] Policy 2 April 28th 06 05:39 PM
Now for the rest of the story! [email protected] General 5 April 26th 06 04:23 PM
Now for the rest of the story! [email protected] Policy 5 April 26th 06 04:23 PM
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 AM Broadcasting 0 November 8th 05 06:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017