Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger Sparks wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: That's easy to comprehend for a battery source. Not so easy for an ideal RF source with a zero series impedance. Unless we allow it absorb energy with the same ease that it emits energy. How can a device with a zero impedance, i.e. zero resistance, zero capacitance, and zero inductance, absorb energy? We can certainly allow it to magically absorb energy but of what use is that? A third way is to allow the energy to be stored in constructive and destructive interference some place in the system. As you know, this is the one I prefer. Another thing that neither you nor Keith has done is to account for the reverse-flowing energy through the source. I suspect if that was done, every thimbleful of energy would be accounted for. So far, net energy calculations have been used on one side of Rs and component energy calculations on the other. That would work only if Rs was not dissipating power. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |