Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 16, 11:56*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote: Q1. Where does this energy come from? Q2. Where does this energy go? Answer to both. We do not know and we do not care. Well, that certainly puts an end to this discussion. An intriguing response. It was such a good example that it just stopped you in your tracks. But was this because you have learned that you were in error and now better understand the behaviour of sources when they are absorbing energy? Or was it because you have realized the contradictions inherent in your previous explanations but can not work out how to resolve them? Or was it because you have detected just a hint of the contradictions to come and want to give up before having to realize their full impact? ...Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | General | |||
Now for the rest of the story! | Policy | |||
WTD: Paul Harvey Rest of the Story broadcasts from Sep 1 thru 6 | Broadcasting |