View Single Post
  #425   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 07:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Cecil Moore[_2_] Cecil Moore[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default The Rest of the Story

Roger Sparks wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
That's easy to comprehend for a battery source. Not so
easy for an ideal RF source with a zero series impedance.


Unless we allow it absorb energy with the same ease that it emits energy.


How can a device with a zero impedance, i.e. zero resistance,
zero capacitance, and zero inductance, absorb energy? We can
certainly allow it to magically absorb energy but of what
use is that?

A third way is to allow the energy to be stored in constructive
and destructive interference some place in the system.


As you know, this is the one I prefer. Another thing that
neither you nor Keith has done is to account for the
reverse-flowing energy through the source. I suspect if
that was done, every thimbleful of energy would be
accounted for. So far, net energy calculations have been
used on one side of Rs and component energy calculations
on the other. That would work only if Rs was not dissipating
power.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com