![]() |
Antenna physical size
|
Antenna physical size
On Apr 14, 12:47 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:50:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I had a couple of 100 ft rolls of speaker wire on cardboard reels so I decided to connect them together as Art had described and they give VSWR indication much as he described even if I stick them in a metal locker. This may be just what a lot of hams are looking for as it is a very quiet antenna. welcome to the minority and stand by for Richard to call you a fool and stupid for listening to Art, I am sure you are the first among many who will now build the antenna and find out for themselves instead of listening to those who say if it is not in a book it cant be done well done. How droll! Perhaps one day you will be able to tell those who are laughing up their sleeve at this. Seeing as you are clueless to the implications of this report, I return to my original question, Derek: Why are you here? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Probably one of Arts relatives... It does boggle the mind.. Jimmie gives a report which seems to indicate it's performance does indeed mimic an air cooled dummy load, and ole Derek thinks the report claims a success of the design as an antenna intended to radiate RF. Cinderella has a mustache, green teeth, and hairy legs it seems. :( I'd bet this lack of noise pertains to most any direction and angle too.. IE: you could spin it round and round, and the noise received will be puny in any direction compared to any real antenna. It's possible the pattern may have a couple of nulls where the noise gets even lower if received from a single source. :/ Art has reinvented the dummy load. And a fairly poorly designed one at that.. :{ Woe is Art. |
Antenna physical size
On Apr 14, 10:47*am, "Jimmie D" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 14, 12:47 am, Richard Clark wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:50:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I had *a couple of 100 ft rolls of speaker wire on cardboard reels so I decided to connect them together as Art had described and they give VSWR indication much as he described even if I stick them in a metal locker. This may be just what a lot of hams are looking for as it is a very quiet antenna. * *welcome to the minority and stand by for Richard to call you a fool and stupid for listening to Art, I am sure you are the first among many who will now build the antenna and find out for themselves instead of listening to those who say if it is not in a book it cant be done * well done. How droll! Perhaps one day you will be able to tell those who are laughing up their sleeve at this. Seeing as you are clueless to the implications of this report, I return to my original question, Derek: * * * * Why are you here? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Probably one of Arts relatives... Probably a sock puppet- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made a small mod to Arts design that greatly improved it as a receiving antenna, I didnt care to risk my finals or melt down a couple of rolls of lamp cord. I connected both leg of the feedline to a single banana plug and connected this to my aerial input |
Antenna physical size
That almost makes sense, so, it has to be cheating.
- 'Doc |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com