| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 25th 08, 03:57 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
160m vertical
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:53:50 -0500, "rb" wrote:
Got about 60' for a vertical. Using 160'm, any length close to this better for 160 (up or down)? Idea is to bottom feed it with an antenna tuner. Yes, radials will be run. Also, will top loading help or hurt? A capacity hat will help, center loading may be easier to deal with than top loading and the general rule is the more the better. (or taller the better in your case.) Good luck  Buck N4PGW -- 73 for now Buck, N4PGW www.lumpuckeroo.com "Small - broadband - efficient: pick any two." |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 160m | Equipment | |||
| 160m | Swap | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| PSK on 160m from 9V | Digital | |||
| PSK on 160m from 9V | Digital | |||
![Buck[_2_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
