Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam wrote:
I tried a 2.5 MHz HPF with an MFJ analyzer to measure a 75 m antenna. Unfortunately there is too much phase shift. Really not usable below about 5 MHz. The MFJ works fine during daytime hours before all the signals come up. The "half wave" filter I described makes no impedance disturbance only at the frequency at which all the components have the same reactance. The cutoff frequency, as I recall, is close to that frequency. So you'd have to make a filter with a cutoff close to 3.8 MHz, not 2.5 MHz, in order to measure a 75 m antenna if you're using this kind of filter. There are, of course, many other types of filters, but just about any will affect the impedance measurement except perhaps over a fairly narrow range of frequencies. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 11:32 am, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Tam wrote: I tried a 2.5 MHz HPF with an MFJ analyzer to measure a 75 m antenna. Unfortunately there is too much phase shift. Really not usable below about 5 MHz. The MFJ works fine during daytime hours before all the signals come up. The "half wave" filter I described makes no impedance disturbance only at the frequency at which all the components have the same reactance. The cutoff frequency, as I recall, is close to that frequency. So you'd have to make a filter with a cutoff close to 3.8 MHz, not 2.5 MHz, in order to measure a 75 m antenna if you're using this kind of filter. There are, of course, many other types of filters, but just about any will affect the impedance measurement except perhaps over a fairly narrow range of frequencies. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Since there is just one frequency that's causing trouble (apparently), and since I gather that it's removed in frequency a pretty good percentage from the frequencies of interest, it may be possible to block it with a fairly sharp notch filter. As Roy notes, the 100.5MHz FM signal may not be the only one causing trouble, but assuming it is, try this: shunt across the input to the analyzer, place a series LC. The L: 9 turns #12AWG bare copper, 0.75" ID, 1.5" long (about 750nH, SRF about 150MHz). The C: a high quality 1-5pF trimmer capacitor. I'd recommend a good piston trimmer, but they tend to be expensive unless you happen to have some or can get some surplus. Depending on the exact coil characteristics, the cap will adjust to a 100MHz resonance at about 2pF. By keeping a high L:C ratio, the notch will be sharp--not as deep as it could be with lower L:C, but it should be deep enough if you use good construction practice. The suggested values should give you at least 25dB attenuation at the notch frequency, and should look practically like the capacitor value (about 2pF) at HF. Cheers, Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trouble with MFJ-269 and local AM broadcast station | Antenna | |||
All Politics Are Local = FCC + Broadcast Industry + US Congress = I$B$O$C | Shortwave | |||
WTB/ WTT for MFJ 259B | Swap | |||
The Newscast Network Offers Local News to Local Radio Markets | Broadcasting | |||
WTB:MFJ 259B | Swap |