Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Howie, GM4DIJ, wrote:
The local 2m beacon ( about 80 miles north and shielded by a local hill) here is horizontally polarised. However if I beam south it is much stronger on vertical polarisation. I have no idea why. Nor do I, really. It could be that a close-by piece of metal is oriented just-so to act as a passive re-radiator for both horizontally and vertically polarised waves (ie: it's at a 45-degree angle to both). It could be that your beam actually has a relatively large, horizontally polarised response in its back lobe. Or that there is some interaction between the beam and its (randomly polarised) feedline. Or that you live in an anomalous neighborhood. ;-) ;-) ;-) The sweepingly general statement I made about radio waves not changing their polarity with distance was made with the unstated assumption of a propagation path relatively free of scattering objects (re-radiators) and having a direct line-of-sight path between transmitting and receiving antennas. Jim, K7JEB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handheld Scanner Antenna Polarization Questions | Antenna | |||
Rotation of the polarization question | Antenna | |||
ISP WAP Polarization | Antenna | |||
Polarization conversion | Antenna | |||
45 degree polarization?? | Antenna |