Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 10:48 am, Jim Lux wrote:
Homer J wrote: Here is a reference to a technical look at short loop antennas from the 1950's by Wheeler. H. A. Wheeler, "Fundamental Limitations of Small Antennas", Proc. IRE, vol. 35, pp. 1479-1484 More specifically, the December 1947 issue From a practical standpoint, this paper is quite useful, although it mixes effects of the matching network in with the antenna, which the more rigorous analyses don't. It also doesn't provide any backup for its assertion of the validity of the "radiansphere" or "radianlength", hence the equations might not be valid over all possible antennas. Wheeler's 1975 paper ("Small Antennas", IEEE Trans Ant & Prop, V AP-23, #4, July 1975, pp462-469) revisits some of the stuff in the earlier paper and provides more backup and describes the limitations of the "radian sphere" model (which he defines as the volume within which the reactive power density is higher than the radiation power density). Of particular interest to would-be miracle small antenna builders is that he specifically mentions the problems if there is anything conductive or magnetic within the empty space oustide the "antenna" but within the radiansphere (defined as lambda/2pi). The latter paper also discusses some electrically small antennas (for 15 kHz, lambda=20km) This is can found in a technical library with access to the IEEE publications web site (e.g. university or military tech library) Thane-fer Homer "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... d. If a receiving signal is well polarized in one direction, say vertically, how much loss would one expect if the receiving antenna is oriented such that its preferred polarization is horiz. ? The usual figure one sees bandied about is 20 dB. I've seen it quoted as "up to 30 dB". That's probably under ideal (or ideally-bad) conditions, though. 20 dB is probably representative of the "polarization purity" of a run of the mill antenna in its preferred direction. To be more specific is Wheeler refering to small FULL wave antennas or smal fractional wave antennas.? These are very different and one must be absolutely clear with what Wheeler is dealing with. My guess is that he is refering to fractional wave antennas which is very common in the communication field Regards Art Unwin KB9mx xg (uk) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Handheld Scanner Antenna Polarization Questions | Antenna | |||
Rotation of the polarization question | Antenna | |||
ISP WAP Polarization | Antenna | |||
Polarization conversion | Antenna | |||
45 degree polarization?? | Antenna |