LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 15th 08, 07:44 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
JN JN is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
Default Linear decoupling traps

Richard thanks for your answer and opinions.
I am not talking abt Lattin or W9INN.
These are things I hear in this thread for the first time.
I am talking abt using 1/4 wave stub as decoupling element
to make a (reduced size?) two band antenna.

This principle is used in commercial antennas like HY-GAIN AT-18
tower vertical and many others, stubs in line with element.
Orr in his antenna book is using orientation, open to center.but in line
with the element
So I am sure the principle works ok, and I was asking abt the different
orientation
alternatives. I understand that you would suggest 90 degree?
But does it really matter?

Designs do work, inventions rarely do. Yes I agree.
Therefore I am not going to build any complex mess where everything is
hanging of everything, just simple one time decoupling the element for
higher fequency.

73 Jouko OH5RM





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effectiveness of decoupling radials Owen Duffy Antenna 14 May 2nd 07 10:22 PM
Capacitor Traps [email protected] Shortwave 0 January 15th 06 07:47 PM
Decoupling coax transmission line Charlie Antenna 3 December 31st 04 04:27 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT Homebrew 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM
WTB : Beam Traps NA1VT General 0 October 16th 04 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017