Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard thanks for your answer and opinions.
I am not talking abt Lattin or W9INN. These are things I hear in this thread for the first time. I am talking abt using 1/4 wave stub as decoupling element to make a (reduced size?) two band antenna. This principle is used in commercial antennas like HY-GAIN AT-18 tower vertical and many others, stubs in line with element. Orr in his antenna book is using orientation, open to center.but in line with the element So I am sure the principle works ok, and I was asking abt the different orientation alternatives. I understand that you would suggest 90 degree? But does it really matter? Designs do work, inventions rarely do. Yes I agree. Therefore I am not going to build any complex mess where everything is hanging of everything, just simple one time decoupling the element for higher fequency. 73 Jouko OH5RM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Effectiveness of decoupling radials | Antenna | |||
Capacitor Traps | Shortwave | |||
Decoupling coax transmission line | Antenna | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | Homebrew | |||
WTB : Beam Traps | General |