Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote: Does the past allow us to predict what is going to happen tomorrow? The sun may not rise tomorrow, but I am willing to bet my 401K that it will. Of course, even if it were to blink out tonight, it'll still do the sunrise thing. That's pretty certain. The issue is those long term cycles. The can predict trends, but can't do a very good job of predicting if it will be rainy today, or if it will even be a cold year or a warm year. One of my favorite moments is on a cold day, some wag will spout "So much for global warming!" Just a public expression of ignorance, whether GW exists or not. Let's make no mistake, we are making this experiment whether we want to or not. There is no way that we are ever going to get the new industrial powers to cut down on CO2 emissions. All of this discussion is academic. We aren't going to cut down our emissions. One of the delicious ironies in all this is that the same people who declare anyone who believes in GW as some sort of leftist have staunch allies who are commies in fact. Go figure. My guess is that now that we have reached the geometric population growth phase, we will deplete our oil, then our coal reserves. At that point, greenhouse emissions will naturally drop. As we tap into the "final reserves" of fossil fuel, likely anything that is in the way will fall. Endangered animals, land preserves, pollution controls. It will be pretty quick. Wars will break out over the remaining fossil fuels. Only so much can be done to conserve. Even if each person uses less energy, there will be plenty of new folks coming along to negate that conservation. I've seen the future, and it isn't too pretty. Although there is an alternative: LOTS more nuc power. Give up on the antiquated and dangerous supply paradigm, in which we just have a few plants running their equipment at about as much power as they can handle, in which any failure makes for big problems. Many smaller and safer plants are in order. Unless there is some sort of breakthrough, we're going to need to run electric cars. We need a new infrastructure built to handle them. Wind power is cool, as is solar, but we jest aren't ready to get the huge amount of power needed from those sources. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
First sunspot of cycle 24 spotted, gloom and doom perdicted :-) | Dx | |||
Sunspot Cycle 24 | Shortwave | |||
Sunspot cycle/Propagation - | Shortwave | |||
Sunspot cycle info please | Dx | |||
Sunspot cycle info please | Dx |