Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I have been running many automated NEC2 runs to optimize a 5 band quad. My criteria included bandwidth and all my runs to date have been done assuming direct feed with 50 Ohm coax. I'd like change the criteria and allow the feedpoint impedance to drop below 50 Ohms now, with the expectation that I would use a gamma match at the feedpoint. Using a gamma match at the feedpoint, for me, would be more advantageous because this means the driven elements of the inactive bands will truly be closed loops (eliminating the need to do other things to achieve this, relays, specific lengths of coax, etc.). I would place a choke at the gamma match feedpoint as well. Since (2.5:1 SWR) bandwidth is still something that is important to me, I need a way to calculate it. Would it be a mistake to take the real impedance at the center design frequency, make this the line Zo and then take the reactance at the center frequency as well and offset the reactance at all frequencies this amount? For instance, if the frequency was 25 - j10, If I make the line Zo = 25 Ohms and then add +10 to all the reactance values, can I use the resulting SWR value to judge bandwidth. I know this assumes that the gamma match is a perfectly linear circuit, which I am sure its not. Is there a better way to estimate the bandwidth and how off could I end up off? Is there any better way to do this? -Scott, WU2X |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
gamma match 70cm handheld | Antenna | |||
Gamma-Match formulas--design? | Antenna | |||
Problem with Gamma Match? | Antenna | |||
Gamma Match | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |