RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Unwin antennas (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/133980-unwin-antennas.html)

Art Unwin June 5th 08 04:08 PM

Unwin antennas
 
Thought I would drop in and provide an update on the above.

The patent request has not emerged by being published as per the norm
as I am my own attorney
thus normal PTO protocol has not been followed as they are assisting
me as per requirements by law.
Regarding the antenna sent to Michigan for testing per a request on
this newsgroup and receipt acknoweledged on this newsgroup.
Since that day therei has been no communication from him. With him
being in the business of antennas that has really surprised me but
again many cruel jokes came about with respect to that antenna.
Now the acedemic semesters have come to an end I am expecting the
professor who has volunteered to supply and publish a paper on my work
should start to pick up again. Papers have to follow a proper protical
with mathematics and the professor has written many papers. As
President of the IEEE group on Antennas and Propagation she will
begiving several talks at the International show in a few weeks at San
Diego after which things should get up to speed.
I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the
lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics
paper requires for submission. The page will be titled Unwin antennas
or something like that for those who wish to read it. I am not coming
back to the group to discuss it or accepting E mails because of passed
experience, but some on this group did supply interesting comments
over the years and it is for them this post is adressesd to.
I'm gone and no. the door did not hit my arse as I left the scene
quite a while ago
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG

John Smith June 6th 08 09:14 PM

Unwin antennas
 
Art Unwin wrote:

..

I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the
lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics
paper requires for submission. ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG


Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted
.... thanks Art.

Regards,
JS

Art Unwin June 9th 08 02:58 PM

Unwin antennas
 
On Jun 6, 3:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:

..


I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the
lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics
paper requires for submission. ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG


Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted
... thanks Art.

Regards,
JS


John, I am new to this stuff. It takes a couple of weeks for the
search engines to pick it up.
In the mean time I have been told that

htt://unwinantennas.com/

will pick it up.
Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet
Have fun
Art

Helmut Wabnig[_2_] June 9th 08 04:50 PM

Unwin antennas
 
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox
wrote:

Read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino





Re-write this:
http://unwinantennas.com/


That unwin page is full utter nonsense.
Absolute crackpottery.


w.

John Smith June 9th 08 05:05 PM

Unwin antennas
 
Art Unwin wrote:
...


htt://unwinantennas.com/

will pick it up.
Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet
Have fun
Art


Works for me! Well, once I added the missing "p" in http ... or:

http://unwinantennas.com/

Thanks Art.

Warm regards,
JS

John Smith June 9th 08 06:49 PM

Unwin antennas
 
Christopher Cox wrote:



Works for me! Well, once I added the missing "p" in http ... or:


Judging from this response, I assume you think I have a problem with the
link. I do not.

I do have a problem with several sentences in the web page. I recently
...


Uh, no ...

But, you do give yourself away with your text and its' direction. Your
problem is a very simple one; you see yourself as the center of
importance and my focus in any exchange of text you and I have had.
Rest assured, you are in error--at least where it involves myself.

Most often, I say what I mean and mean what I say.

Your tea leaves, crystal balls and examinations of my text are likely
only lead you to draw more erroneous conclusions, and are likely to lead
you further astray of my meanings and intentions--given your mindset ...

Or, in summary, if you desire a childish conflict, search for those of a
like mind and purpose.

Regards,
JS

John Smith June 9th 08 07:36 PM

Unwin antennas
 
Christopher Cox wrote:

...
Ok, you are right.

What did you mean by the phrase "Works for me" so that I can be corrected.

Thanks for all your help.

Chris


Really? That is the problem? Huh, never would have seen that one coming!

OK, let me expand and give greater detail on "the meaning" of those
words, by example--at least where they involve myself.

1) Say a host offers me a Jim Beam on ice at a social event--I have
replied, "That works for me!" (my favorite drink is a Vodka Collins!)

2) A kludge is thrown together to patch a nasty little glitch in a
computer program (a real fix will be done later), I have replied, "Works
for me!"

3) Someone offers me a website which provides the data/information I
have requested, they have made a slight error which I wish to, and
mostly overlook--so, playing down the importance of such, I reply,
"Works for me ..."

4) The wife purchases a new "nightie", I have been known to reply, on
occasion, "THAT WORKS FOR ME!" EVIL GRIN

5) etc ...

Again, I feel you are too focused on your "perceived importance" or else
my desire for conflict, I assure you, I am unhindered by such.

Perhaps and far too often, one is given to find what one searches for.
Let's control the direction of these endeavors. And, in such light, I
am pleased you asked for clarification, so my intents would become known
to you--hopefully, you will accept my stated intent.

Regards,
JS

[email protected] June 9th 08 08:32 PM

Unwin antennas
 
On Jun 9, 10:50 am, Helmut Wabnig hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:26:34 -0400, Christopher Cox

wrote:
Read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino
Re-write this:
http://unwinantennas.com/


That unwin page is full utter nonsense.
Absolute crackpottery.

w.


That pottery is so cracked, even epoxy wouldn't help
put Unwin Dumpty back together again.. :/







Dave June 10th 08 12:16 AM

Unwin antennas
 
great one art! a work of absolute unabashed fiction.. i wonder how many
will bite??? I needed something to make me laugh, and that definately
filled the bill tonight!


"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...
On Jun 6, 3:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:

..


I will put up a page later today that will be intended more for the
lay man and without all the mathematical details that a true physics
paper requires for submission. ...
Art Unwin KB9MZ.......XG


Will be looking forward to giving that paper a glance, keep me posted
... thanks Art.

Regards,
JS


John, I am new to this stuff. It takes a couple of weeks for the
search engines to pick it up.
In the mean time I have been told that

htt://unwinantennas.com/

will pick it up.
Don't know what else I can do as I haven't tried it for myself yet
Have fun
Art




John Smith June 10th 08 01:58 AM

Unwin antennas
 
Christopher Cox wrote:
...


As always, you are free to carry on ...

Regards,
JS


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com