Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Smith" wrote in message ...
From the design side, MPTT is defined at an interface, and minimizes "reflected power" at that interface, and that is it. The other items about matching are also quite important, such as stability, loading, impedance transfer (both directions), bandwidth, Qs, loaded Qs etc. But that is Not MPTT. There is a tradeoff between these, if one can also obtain mptt, great, but close is good too. mptt is just one of several parameters needed to optimize a match. At times there are too many unknowns and the matching is experimental (class C) Experimental ! Not any more, the computor does it quite easily Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |