| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Smith wrote:
Checkout "Reference Data for Radio Engineers", Transmission lines, Mismatch and Transducer losses. There are formulas there for this case. The simplification ignores the mismatches at the Tx and Antenna to the line, which causes about 4.43 dB additional "mismatch" loss, in the case of 50,450, 50. This shows up as VSWR. There is little actual loss due to the "mismatch loss" since the system is Z0-matched. Let's add a small length of 50 ohm line. 100W XMTR--50 ohm line---x---1/2WL 450 ohm line----50 ohm balanced load. Since there are no reflections on the 50 ohm line, the system is Z0-matched to 50 ohms at point x. (Assume a 9:1 balun at 'x') The 9:1 SWR on the 450 ohm line causes very little loss and the "mismatch loss" is not really lost because the forward power on the 450 ohm line is 278 watts, delivering virtually all of the 100 watts of XMTR power to the load. It can be illustrated that a steady-state destructive interference event toward the source due to wave cancellation at point 'x' feeds energy to a constructive interference event in the direction of the load. This has been understood in the field of optics for many decades and is how non-glare glass works. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
| The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna | |||