LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 4th 04, 07:55 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Smith wrote:
Agreed that adding a 9:1 balun (impedance match) will have little mismatch
loss at x and all the Tx power will be "presented" to the antenna port.


Oh Boy, I really screwed up. Replace that 9:1 balun with a 1:1 balun.
I was very stupid to have said 9:1. A 9:1 balun would reduce that 50
ohm Z0-match to 5.56 ohms thus creating a mismatch.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Complex Z0 [Corrected] pez Antenna 41 September 11th 03 06:00 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 03:27 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017